| Peer-Reviewed

Product Market Competition and Debt Choice: A Study on Cement Companies Enlisted in Capital Market in Bangladesh

Received: 24 February 2022    Accepted: 21 March 2022    Published: 29 March 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to contribute to this body of knowledge by examining the effect of product market competitiveness on enterprises' dependence on bank loans. Design/methodology/approach: To examine the effect of product market rivalry on loan selection, we look at a sample of Bangladeshi firms from 2010 to 2020. We limit our research to publicly traded corporations since they often choose between public and private debt. The generalized least square (GLS) model is applied to identify the effect of product market competitiveness on enterprises' dependence on bank loans. Findings: Using a sample of 60 firms, between 2010 and 2020, we discovered that product market competition encouraged enterprises to rely less on bank loan funding. Additionally, we demonstrate that competitive pressure has a more significant impact on debt selection for firms that are more exposed to competition, face more significant financial constraints, and have less robust governance practices. Additionally, we observe a correlation between competition in the product market and long-term maturity debt. A critical insight we establish in our study is that external governance pressure from the product market can act as a replacement for the monitoring of bank debt. Research limitations/implications: Despite the DSE having 308 listed businesses, the study only considers the top 60 as market capitalization. As a result, the small sample size may limit the generalizations that can be derived from our findings. Another disadvantage is that the study only looked at cement businesses, even though the DSE has a variety of companies listed. Originality/value: Our research paper contributes to the existing literature on Product Market Competition and Debt Choice in an emerging market like Bangladesh. To the best of the authors' knowledge, no study has yet been conducted on the Product Market Competition and Debt Choice for taking five-year financial statements in Bangladesh.

Published in Journal of Business and Economic Development (Volume 7, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.jbed.20220701.15
Page(s) 31-37
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Competition in the Product Market, Capital Market, Debt Structure, Debt Choice, Corporate Governance, DSE

References
[1] Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52, 737‒ 783.
[2] Dyck, A. and L. Zingales. 2004. Private benefits of control: An international comparison. Journal of Finance 59, 537‒600.
[3] Baggs, J. and J. E. Bettignies. 2007. Product market competition and agency costs. The Journal of Industrial Economics 55, 289‒323.
[4] Yosha, O. 1995. Information disclosure costs and the choice of financing source. Journal of Financial Intermediation 4, 3‒20.
[5] Fama, E. F. 1985. What’s different about banks? Journal of Monetary Economics 15, 29‒39.
[6] Hadlock, C. J. and C. M. James. 2002. Do banks provide financial slack? Journal of Finance 57, 1383‒1419.
[7] Verrecchia, R. E. 1983. Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5, 179‒194.
[8] Hoshi, T., A. Kashyap, and D. Scharfstein. 1990. The role of banks in reducing the costs of financial distress in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics 27, 67‒88.
[9] Chemmanur, T. J. and P. Fulghieri. 1994. Reputation, renegotiation and the choice between bank loans and publicly traded debt. The Review of Financial Studies 7, 475‒506.
[10] Bolton, P. and D. S. Scharfstein. 1990. A theory of predation based on agency problems in financial contracting. The American Economic Review 80, 93‒106.
[11] Froot, K. A., D. S. Scharfstein, and J. C. Stein. 1993. Risk management: Coordinating corporate investment and financing policies. Journal of Finance 48, 1629-1658.
[12] Akdogu, E. and P. MacKay. 2012. Product markets and corporate investment: Theory and evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance 36, 439-453.
[13] Berlin, M. and J. Loeys. 1988. Bond covenants and delegated monitoring. Journal of Finance 43, 397‒412.
[14] Rajan, R. G. 1992. Insiders and outsiders: The choice between informed and arm’s length debt. Journal of Finance 47, 1367‒1400.
[15] Stiglitz, J and A. Weiss. 1983. Incentive effects of termination: Applications to credit and labor markets. American Economic Review 73, 912‒927.
[16] Park, C. 2000. Monitoring and the structure of debt contracts. Journal of Finance 55. 2157‒2195.
[17] Giroud, X. and H. M. Mueller. 2010. Does corporate governance matter in competitive industries? Journal of Financial Economics 95, 312‒331.
[18] Giroud, X. and H. M. Mueller. 2011. Corporate governance, product market competition and equity prices. Journal of Finance 66, 563‒600.
[19] Chhaochharia, V., Y. Grinstein, G. Grullon, and R. Michealy. 2016. Product market competition and internal governance: Evidence from the Sarbanes Oxley Act. Management Science 63, 1405–1424.
[20] Hoberg, G., G. Philips, and N. Prabhala. 2014. Product market threats, payouts and financial flexibility. Journal of Finance 69, 293‒324.
[21] Diamond, D. W. 1991. Monitoring and reputation: The choice between bank loans and directly placed debt, The Journal of Political Economy 99, 689‒721.
[22] Diamond, D. W. 1991. Debt maturity structure and liquidity risk. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 709‒737.
[23] Li, X., C. Lin, and X. Zhan. 2015. Does change in information environment affect the choice between bank debt and public debt? Working Paper, The University of Hong Kong.
[24] Lin, C., Y. Ma, P. Malatesta, and Y. Xuan. 2013. Corporate ownership structure and the choice between bank debt and public debt. Journal of Financial Economics 109, 517‒534.
[25] Boubaker, S., W. Rouatbi, and W. Saffar. 2017. The role of multiple large shareholders in the choice of debt source. Financial Management 46, 241‒274.
[26] Bharath, S. T., and M. Hertzel. 2016. External governance and debt structure. Working Paper, Arizona State University.
[27] Dhaliwal, D., S. Huang, I. K. Khurana, and R. Pereira. 2014. Product market competition and conditional conservatism. Review of Accounting Studies 19, 1309‒1345.
[28] Datta, S., M. Iskandar-Datta, and V. Singh. 2013. Product market power, industry structure and corporate earnings management. Journal of Banking and Finance 37, 3237‒3285.
[29] Kim, K., A. Gopal, and G. Hoberg. 2016. Does product market competition drive CVC investment? Evidence from the U.S. IT industry. Information Systems Research 27, 259‒281.
[30] Haushalter, D., S. Klasa, and W. F. Maxwell. 2007. The influence of product market dynamics on a firm’s cash holdings and hedging behavior. Journal of Financial Economics 84, 797‒825.
[31] Xu, J. 2012. Profitability and capital structure: Evidence from import penetration. Journal of Financial Economics 106, 427‒446.
[32] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hhi.asp
[33] Denis, D. J. and V. T. Mihov. 2003. The choice among bank debt, non-bank private debt, and public debt: Evidence from new corporate borrowings. Journal of Financial Economics 70, 3‒28.
[34] Blackwell, D. W. and D. S. Kidwell. 1988. An investigation of cost differences between public sales and private placement of debt. Journal of Financial Economics 22, 253‒278.
[35] Altman, E. I., Iwanicz-Drozdowska, M., Laitinen, E. K. and Suvas, A., 2017. Financial distress prediction in an international context: A review and empirical analysis of Altman's Z-score model. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 28 (2), pp. 131-171.
[36] Bagnoli, M. and S. G. Watts. 2010. Oligopoly, disclosure, and earnings management. The Accounting Review 85, 1191‒1214.
[37] Colla, P., F. Ippolito, and K. Li. 2013. Debt Specialization. Journal of Finance 68, 2117‒2141.
[38] Dedman, E. and C. Lennox. 2009. Perceived competition, profitability and the withholding of information about sales and the cost of sales. Journal of Accounting and Economics 48, 210‒ 230.
[39] Fresard, L. and P. Valta. 2016. How does corporate investment respond to increased entry threat? Review of Corporate Finance Studies 5, 1‒35.
[40] Hart, O. D. 1983. The market mechanism as an incentive scheme. The Bell Journal of Economis 14, 366‒382.
[41] Houston, J. and C. James. 1996. Banks information monopoly and the mix of private and public debt claims. Journal of Finance 51, 1863‒1889.
[42] Krishnaswami, S., P. A Spindt, and V. Subramaniam. 1999. Information asymmetry, monitoring, and the placement structure of corporate debt. Journal of Financial Economics 51, 407‒434.
[43] Rauh, J. D., and A. Sufi. 2010. Capital structure and debt structure. Review of Financial Studies 23, 4242‒4280.
[44] Verrecchia, R. E. and J. Weber. 2006. Redacted disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research 44, 791‒ 814.
[45] Rhoades, S. A., 1993. The herfindahl-hirschman index. Fed. Res. Bull., 79, p. 188.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Md. Sabuj Hossain, Md. Nazmul Huda, Md. Noman Siddik, Md. Khaled, Md. Jamsedul Islam, et al. (2022). Product Market Competition and Debt Choice: A Study on Cement Companies Enlisted in Capital Market in Bangladesh. Journal of Business and Economic Development, 7(1), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20220701.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Md. Sabuj Hossain; Md. Nazmul Huda; Md. Noman Siddik; Md. Khaled; Md. Jamsedul Islam, et al. Product Market Competition and Debt Choice: A Study on Cement Companies Enlisted in Capital Market in Bangladesh. J. Bus. Econ. Dev. 2022, 7(1), 31-37. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20220701.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Md. Sabuj Hossain, Md. Nazmul Huda, Md. Noman Siddik, Md. Khaled, Md. Jamsedul Islam, et al. Product Market Competition and Debt Choice: A Study on Cement Companies Enlisted in Capital Market in Bangladesh. J Bus Econ Dev. 2022;7(1):31-37. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20220701.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jbed.20220701.15,
      author = {Md. Sabuj Hossain and Md. Nazmul Huda and Md. Noman Siddik and Md. Khaled and Md. Jamsedul Islam and Md. Majnur Rahman},
      title = {Product Market Competition and Debt Choice: A Study on Cement Companies Enlisted in Capital Market in Bangladesh},
      journal = {Journal of Business and Economic Development},
      volume = {7},
      number = {1},
      pages = {31-37},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jbed.20220701.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20220701.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jbed.20220701.15},
      abstract = {Purpose: This study aims to contribute to this body of knowledge by examining the effect of product market competitiveness on enterprises' dependence on bank loans. Design/methodology/approach: To examine the effect of product market rivalry on loan selection, we look at a sample of Bangladeshi firms from 2010 to 2020. We limit our research to publicly traded corporations since they often choose between public and private debt. The generalized least square (GLS) model is applied to identify the effect of product market competitiveness on enterprises' dependence on bank loans. Findings: Using a sample of 60 firms, between 2010 and 2020, we discovered that product market competition encouraged enterprises to rely less on bank loan funding. Additionally, we demonstrate that competitive pressure has a more significant impact on debt selection for firms that are more exposed to competition, face more significant financial constraints, and have less robust governance practices. Additionally, we observe a correlation between competition in the product market and long-term maturity debt. A critical insight we establish in our study is that external governance pressure from the product market can act as a replacement for the monitoring of bank debt. Research limitations/implications: Despite the DSE having 308 listed businesses, the study only considers the top 60 as market capitalization. As a result, the small sample size may limit the generalizations that can be derived from our findings. Another disadvantage is that the study only looked at cement businesses, even though the DSE has a variety of companies listed. Originality/value: Our research paper contributes to the existing literature on Product Market Competition and Debt Choice in an emerging market like Bangladesh. To the best of the authors' knowledge, no study has yet been conducted on the Product Market Competition and Debt Choice for taking five-year financial statements in Bangladesh.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Product Market Competition and Debt Choice: A Study on Cement Companies Enlisted in Capital Market in Bangladesh
    AU  - Md. Sabuj Hossain
    AU  - Md. Nazmul Huda
    AU  - Md. Noman Siddik
    AU  - Md. Khaled
    AU  - Md. Jamsedul Islam
    AU  - Md. Majnur Rahman
    Y1  - 2022/03/29
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20220701.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jbed.20220701.15
    T2  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
    JF  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
    JO  - Journal of Business and Economic Development
    SP  - 31
    EP  - 37
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2637-3874
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20220701.15
    AB  - Purpose: This study aims to contribute to this body of knowledge by examining the effect of product market competitiveness on enterprises' dependence on bank loans. Design/methodology/approach: To examine the effect of product market rivalry on loan selection, we look at a sample of Bangladeshi firms from 2010 to 2020. We limit our research to publicly traded corporations since they often choose between public and private debt. The generalized least square (GLS) model is applied to identify the effect of product market competitiveness on enterprises' dependence on bank loans. Findings: Using a sample of 60 firms, between 2010 and 2020, we discovered that product market competition encouraged enterprises to rely less on bank loan funding. Additionally, we demonstrate that competitive pressure has a more significant impact on debt selection for firms that are more exposed to competition, face more significant financial constraints, and have less robust governance practices. Additionally, we observe a correlation between competition in the product market and long-term maturity debt. A critical insight we establish in our study is that external governance pressure from the product market can act as a replacement for the monitoring of bank debt. Research limitations/implications: Despite the DSE having 308 listed businesses, the study only considers the top 60 as market capitalization. As a result, the small sample size may limit the generalizations that can be derived from our findings. Another disadvantage is that the study only looked at cement businesses, even though the DSE has a variety of companies listed. Originality/value: Our research paper contributes to the existing literature on Product Market Competition and Debt Choice in an emerging market like Bangladesh. To the best of the authors' knowledge, no study has yet been conducted on the Product Market Competition and Debt Choice for taking five-year financial statements in Bangladesh.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Business Administration, Bangladesh University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

  • Department of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali, Bangladesh

  • Department of Banking and Insurance, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh

  • Department of Accounting, Directorate of Secondary and Higher Education, Chittagong, Bangladesh

  • Department of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali, Bangladesh

  • Department of Economics, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali, Bangladesh

  • Sections