Volume 2, Issue 4, November 2017, Page: 255-261
The Impact of Demographic and Social Factors on Firm Performance in Kenya
Sagire Lucas, School of Economics, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
Received: Jul. 25, 2017;       Accepted: Aug. 14, 2017;       Published: Oct. 11, 2017
DOI: 10.11648/j.jbed.20170204.18      View  1209      Downloads  58
Abstract
An excellent performance in terms of output or profitability is one of the major goals of any firm. In order to achieve this, firms use various inputs such as financial resources (capital), human resources (labor force), technology among others. Demographic factors such as gender, education level and age also play a key role. The current study investigated the impact of these demographic and social factors on performance of business firms in Kenya using data from MSME 2016 survey, which was conducted by Kenya National Bureau of Statistics in 2016. Firm performance was measured by average monthly revenue, which is equivalent to the value of the firm’s maximized output. The factors investigated include education level, gender and age of the firm. In addition to these factors, the study also investigated the effect of labor force, capital and firm’s ownership structure on performance. Ordinary least squares technique and descriptive statistics were used. The study found that education level and age of the firm have a positive effect on performance. Firms operated by males were found to have a better performance than those operated by females. In addition, the study found that partnerships, cooperatives and companies (both private and public limited) perform better than family owned business firms did. (JEL D21, D22, D24, M21).
Keywords
Demographic and Social Factors, Firm Performance, Inputs, Revenue
To cite this article
Sagire Lucas, The Impact of Demographic and Social Factors on Firm Performance in Kenya, Journal of Business and Economic Development. Vol. 2, No. 4, 2017, pp. 255-261. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20170204.18
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Aapola, S. (2002) Exploring Dimensions of Age in Young People's Lives: A discourse analytical approach. Time & Society, 11(2-3), 295-314.
[2]
Agarwal, R., & Gort, M. (2002). Firm and product life cycles and firm survival. The American Economic Review, 92(2), 184-190.
[3]
Antoncic, B. (2009). The entrepreneur's general personality traits and technological developments.
[4]
Chandler, G. N., & Jansen, E. (1992). The founder's self-assessed competence and venture performance. Journal of Business venturing, 7(3), 223-236.
[5]
Chen, L. (2012). The effect of ownership structure on firm performance. MSC in Finance & International Business.
[6]
Chowdhury, M. S., Alam, Z., & Arif, M. I. (2013). Success factors of entrepreneurs of small and medium sized enterprises: Evidence from Bangladesh. Business and Economic Research, 3(2), 38.
[7]
Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2013). Like milk or wine: Does firm performance improve with age?. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 24, 173-189.
[8]
Douwe P. Flapper, S., Fortuin, L., & Stoop, P. P. (1996). Towards consistent performance management systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(7), 27-37.
[9]
Ericson, R., & Pakes, A. (1995). Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work. The Review of Economic Studies, 62(1), 53-82.
[10]
Esaete, M. (2005). Quality of Record Keeping and performance in Small Business Enterprises. Unpublished Master Thesis, Makerere University Business School, Kampala, Uganda.
[11]
Frederic, D., Davidson, P., & William, B. G. (2003). Arriving at High Growth Firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189.
[12]
Gaur, J., & Gupta, R. (2011). Comparing firm performance on the basis of age, size, leverage, and group affiliation in Indian IT industry. Romanian Journal of Marketing, (3), 8.
[13]
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of management review, 20(4), 986-1014
[14]
Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1996). The resource-advantage theory of competition: dynamics, path dependencies, and evolutionary dimensions. The Journal of marketing, 107-114.
[15]
Ismail, A. I., Rose, R. C., Abdullah, H., & Uli, J. (2010). The relationship between organisational competitive advantage and performance moderated by the age and size of firms. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 15(2), 157-173.
[16]
Kapopoulos, P., & Lazaretou, S. (2007). Corporate ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from Greek firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 144-158.
[17]
Kelley, D. J., Singer, S., & Herrington, M. (2012). The global entrepreneurship monitor. 2011 Global Report, GEM 2011, 7.
[18]
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (2016). Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Survey. Nairobi: Government printer.
[19]
Loderer, C. F., & Waelchli, U. (2010). Firm age and performance.
[20]
Mhlanga and Vallabh (2015). Influence of demographic factors on business performance in small to medium tourism enterprises (SMTEs). African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure; Vol. 4(2)-2015 ISSN.
[21]
Osunsan, O. K., Nowak, J., Mabonga, E., Pule, S., Kibirige, A. R., & Baliruno, J. B. (2015). Firm Age and Performance in Kampala, Uganda: A Selection of Small Business Enterprises. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1(5), 412-422.
[22]
Phillips, B. D., & Kirchhoff, B. A. (1989). Formation, growth and survival; small firm dynamics in the US economy. Small Business Economics, 1(1), 65-74.
[23]
Radipere, S., & Dhliwayo, S. (2014). The role of gender and education on small business performance in the South African small enterprise sector. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(9), 104.
[24]
Raposo, M., do Paço, A., & Ferreira, J. (2008). Entrepreneur's profile: a taxonomy of attributes and motivations of university students. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(2), 405-418.
[25]
Reynolds, P. D., Gartner, W. B., Greene, P. G., Cox, L. W., & Carter, N. M. (2002). The entrepreneur next door: Characteristics of individuals starting companies in America: An executive summary of the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics.
[26]
Sajilan, S., Hadi, N. U., & Tehseen, S. (2015). Impact of Entrepreneur's Demographic Characteristics and Personal Characteristics on Firm's Performance Under the Mediating Role of Entrepreneur Orientation. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 4(2), 36.
[27]
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
[28]
Storey, D. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. London: Routledge
[29]
Stuart, R. W., & Abetti, P. A. (1990). Impact of entrepreneurial and management experience on early performance. Journal of business venturing, 5(3), 151-162.
[30]
Taufil-Mohd, K. N., Md-Rus, R., & Musallam, S. R. (2013). The effect of ownership structure on firm performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(2), 75-81.
[31]
Verheul, I., van Stel, A. J., & Thurik, A. R. (2004). Explaining female and male entrepreneurship across 29 countries (No. 0804). Papers on entrepreneurship, growth and public policy.
[32]
Welmilla, I., Weerakkody, W. A. S., & Ediriweera, A. N. (2011). The Impact of Demographic Factors of Entrepreneurs on Development of SMEs in Tourism Industry in Sri Lanka. Faculty of Commerce and Management Studies, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
[33]
Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self‐efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 31(3), 387-406.
Browse journals by subject