Volume 3, Issue 1, March 2018, Page: 17-21
Influence of Hospital Capabilities on Organizational Performance of Mission Hospitals in Kenya
Peter Gaturu, Departmnet of Business Studies, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
Daniel Oigo, Department of Business Administration and Management Science, Szent István University, Godollo, Hungary
Received: Nov. 29, 2017;       Accepted: Dec. 15, 2017;       Published: Jan. 19, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.jbed.20180301.13      View  1028      Downloads  45
Modern healthcare is characterized by new disease patterns; advanced technologies; unpredictable patients’ needs; physical infrastructure and diverse workforce requirements. A hospital is mainly the first point of health care service delivery; and is indispensable in fostering a healthy population. The health sector in Kenya has allowed a diverse non-governmental healthcare sector to develop. Mission hospitals belong to this sector and can significantly improve their service delivery with proper application of strategic management practices. The field of strategic management has undergone a major shift in focus over the last two decades regarding organizational performance variation: from industry's specific to organization-specific factors. Since the inception of strategic management studies in the 1950s; scholars have sought to know determinants that make some organizations more successful than others. This quest has created a bifurcated view, one on industry structure and the other on specific organizational resources.
Organizational Performance, Hospital Capabilities, Strategic Decisions, Hospital Performance and Mission Hospitals
To cite this article
Peter Gaturu, Daniel Oigo, Influence of Hospital Capabilities on Organizational Performance of Mission Hospitals in Kenya, Journal of Business and Economic Development. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2018, pp. 17-21. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20180301.13
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Adams et. al (2007). Research Methods for Graduate Business and Social Science Students. Los Angeles, USA: Sage.
Barney JB, Arikan AM. 2002. The resource-based view: origins and implications. In Handbook of Strategic Management, Hitt MA, Freeman RE, Harrison JS (eds). Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 124–188. Barney JB.
Church Health Association of Kenya (2000). The Mission of the Church in Health Care.
Claver-Cortés, E., Pertusa-Ortega, E. M., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2012). Characteristics of organizational structure relating to hybrid competitive strategy: Implications for performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 993–1002.
David g. Hoopes, Tammy. Madsen and Gordon Walker. (2003). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: why is there a resource-based view? toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. J., 24: 889–902 (2003) Published online in Wiley Inter Science (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/smj.356.
Dibrell, C., Craig, J. & Neubaum, D. (2007). Linking the formal strategic planning process, planning flexibility, and innovativeness to firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67 (4).
Eiriz, V., Barbosa, N. & Figueiredo, J. (2010). A conceptual framework to analyze hospital competitiveness. The service Industrial Journal, 30(3), 437-448.
Galbreath, J., & Galvin, P. (2008). Firm factors, industry structure and performance variation: New empirical evidence to a classic debate. Journal of Business Research, 61, 109-117.
Gautam Ahuja and Riitta Katila (2004). where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. J., 25: 887–907 (2004) Published online in Wiley Inter Science (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/smj.401
Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2005). Exploring Corporate Strategy. New Delhi, India: Pearson Education Ltd.
Joseph E. Coombs and Paul E. Bierly III (2006). Measuring technological capability and performance. volume 36, issue 4 aodheen o’donnell, audrey gilmore, david carson and darryl cummins.
Karabag, S. F. (2008). Effects of strategy and industry on firm performance: An examination on Turkish leading manufacturing companies (in Turkish). (PhD Dissertation). Adana: The Publications of the Social Science Institute, Çukurova University.
Ortega, M. J. R. (2010). Competitive strategies and firm performance: Technological capabilities' moderating roles. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1273-1281.
Salamon, S. D., & Robinson, S. L. (2008). Trust that binds: The impact of collective felt trust on organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 593-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.593.
Wright M, Ketchen DJ. 2001. The resource based view of the firm: ten years after 1991. Journal of Management 27: 625–641.
Browse journals by subject