Volume 3, Issue 3, September 2018, Page: 77-85
Analysis of Economic Development Impact of Remittances on Recipient (Zimbabwe) and Remitting (South Africa) Countries
George Chirwa, Department of Leadership, University of Kwazulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
Abdulla Kader, Department of Leadership, University of Kwazulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
Received: Aug. 20, 2018;       Accepted: Oct. 29, 2018;       Published: Nov. 21, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.jbed.20180303.13      View  26      Downloads  12
Abstract
The importance of remittances to recipient economies has been greatly researched and there is a general consensus around their continued significance to these countries. However, their impact on the development of the receiving economies remains a subject of much debate among academics and policy makers. There is even greater dearth of academic research and debate around the impact of remittances on the sending economies. Unlike Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows, whose impact on the economies can be closely correlated to the economies’ outputs, remittances are micro-payments fragmented to multiple recipients, from multiple individual senders with different motives and for a multitude of uses. The researcher modified The Newtonian Gravity model first adapted by a Dutch economist, Timbergen as the first published proponent of the Newtonian gravity model application in analysis of financial flows. The model was applied to remittance flows between the sender and recipient countries, and assess the economic impact on the two economies. The key corridor of the research was between Zimbabwe and South Africa, which represents one of the biggest regional remittances flow corridors in Africa. The investigation revealed that remittances not only had a significant impact on recipient economies, but showed a negative correlation with Zimbabwe’s GDP in particular. Outflows of remittances proved to have very little impact on the sending country, South Africa. On further examination of the other countries studied, distance from the main remitting country had a negative correlation with remittances flows. Economic impairment of receiving countries increased their dependency on the remittances flows, and the funds were not directed at activities that directly contributed to GDP growth of recipient countries.
Keywords
Remittances, Economic Development, Gravity Model
To cite this article
George Chirwa, Abdulla Kader, Analysis of Economic Development Impact of Remittances on Recipient (Zimbabwe) and Remitting (South Africa) Countries, Journal of Business and Economic Development. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2018, pp. 77-85. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20180303.13
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Baas, T. and Melzer, S. M. 2012. The macroeconomic impact of remittances: A sending country perspective. Journal of International Economics. Norface Migration Discussion Paper No. 2012-21.
[2]
Barajas, A., Chami, R., Fullenkamp, C., Gapen, M. & Montiel, P. (2009). Do workers remittances promote economic growth? IMF Working Paper, Middle Eastern and Central Asian Department.
[3]
Bracking, S. and Sachikonye, L. 2006. Remittances, poverty reduction and the informalisation of household wellbeing in Zimbabwe. Oxford: GPRG.
[4]
Crush, J. and D. Tevera (2010). “Exiting Zimbabwe.” In Zimbabwe’s exodus: Crisis, migration, survival, edited by J. Crush and D. Tevera. Page 51. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
[5]
De Haas, H. 2005. International migration, remittances and development: Myths and facts. Third World Quarterly. 26(8): 1269-1284.
[6]
Desai, M. A., Kapur, D. & McHale, J. 2001. Sharing the spoils: Taxing international human capital flows. Weekly Political Economy Discussion Paper, Harvard University.
[7]
Dustmann, C. and Mestres, J. 2010. Remittances and temporary migration. Journal of Development Economics, 92: 62-70.
[8]
Ehrhart, H., Le Goff, M., Rocher, E. & Singh, R. J. 2014. Does migration foster exports: Evidence from Africa. Policy Research Working Paper 6739, New York: Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit, The World Bank.
[9]
Eurotrade, 2012, Zimbabwe, EU Bilateral Trade and Trade with the World, 5-13 July, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2011/january/tradoc_147429.pdf.
[10]
Faustino, C. H. and Leitao, N. C. 2008. Using the gravity equation to explain the Portuguese immigration-trade link. WP12/2008/DE/SOCIUS. Lisbon: School of Economics and Management, Technical University of Lisbon.
[11]
Finmark Trust, 2015. Remittances from South Africa to SADC. Geoff Orpen, 26th March 2015.
[12]
Freund, C. and Spatafora, N. 2005. Remittances: Transaction Costs, determinants and informal flows. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3704. Washington, D. C.: World Bank.
[13]
Girma, F. and Yu, G. 2002. The link between immigration and trade: Evidence from the United Kingdom, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 138 (1).
[14]
Giuliano, P. and Ruiz-Arranz, M. (2006). ‘Remittances, Financial Development and Growth’. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 2160. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/34035.
[15]
Gould, D. M. 1994. Immigrant links to the home country: Empirical implications for U.S. bilateral trade flows. In The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press.
[16]
Head, K. and Ries, J. 1998. Immigration and trade creation: Econometric evidence from Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics, 31 (1): 47-62.
[17]
Krugman, P. R. & Obstfeld, M. 2005. International economics: Theory and practice. (7th ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
[18]
Lueth, E. and Ruiz-Arranz, M. 2006. A gravity model of workers’ remittances. IMF Working Paper. Asia and Pacific Department. WP/06/290.
[19]
Maphosa, F. 2005. The impact of remittances from Zimbabweans working in South Africa on rural livelihoods in southern districts of Zimbabwe. Forced Migration Working Paper Series #14.
[20]
Martínez-Zarzoso, I. & Nowak-Lehmann, F. D. 2004. Economic and Geographical Distance: Explaining Mercosur Sectoral Exports to the EU. Open Economies Review (2004) 15: 291.
[21]
Olney, W. W. 2014. Remittances and the wage impact of immigration. Journal of Human Resources, 50 (3): 694-727 in international trade: Using a gravity approach for exploring bilateral trade flows. The 42nd Congress of the European Regional Science Association, August 2002, Dortmund, Germany.
[22]
Paas, T. 2002. European integration and EU Eastward enlargement process in international trade: Using a gravity approach for exploring bilateral trade flows. The 42nd Congress of the European Regional Science Association, August 2002, Dortmund, Germany.
[23]
Parsons, C. 2005. Quantifying the trade – migration nexus of the enlarged EU: A comedy of errors or much ado about nothing? Sussex Migration Working Paper no. 27, Sussex Centre for Migration Research.
[24]
Partridge, A. 2013. Africa-South Africa trading relationship, [Online]. Available from: http://www.tralac.org/files/2013/10/Africa-South-Africa-trading-relationship_Synopsis.pdf [Accessed 27 April 2017].
[25]
Paton, B. 1995. Labour export policy in the development of Southern Africa. Harare. University of Zimbabwe.
[26]
Piperakis, S. A., Milner, C. & Wright, P. W. 2003. Immigration, trade costs and trade: Gravity evidence of Greece. Journal of Economic Integration 18 (4).
[27]
Rauch, J. and Trindade, V. 2002. Ethnic Chinese networks in international trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84 (1).
[28]
Tinbergen, Jan. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund, 1962.
[29]
Vezina, P. 2011. How migrant networks facilitate trade: Evidence from Swiss Exports, London: OxCarre and Department of Economics, University of Oxford.
[30]
World Bank 2013. Remittances prices worldwide, Q3 [Online]. Available from: http://go.worldbank.org/7RKUKJF3Q0 [Accessed 14 May 2015].
Browse journals by subject