Volume 3, Issue 3, September 2018, Page: 97-105
Analysis on the Imitation Effect of Investment Decisions in Internet Lending Market
Bo Yao, National Academy of Economic Strategy, China Academy of Social Science, Beijing, China; Institute of Digital Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China
Received: Oct. 15, 2018;       Accepted: Oct. 30, 2018;       Published: Nov. 29, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.jbed.20180303.15      View  21      Downloads  9
Abstract
Nowadays, internet lending has become an important model that cannot be ignored in China financial lending market. Based on the individual transaction data of Chinese Paipaidai website, this paper examines the existence, rationality, decline and heterogeneity of the imitation effect of lenders’ investment decisions in China internet lending market. It is found that the potential lenders’ investment decisions imitation effect in the internet lending market is influenced by the previous cumulative bid times and the previous cumulative fundraising amount. With the decrease of information transmitted by the characteristics of imitation effect, the follow-up imitation effect of potential lenders will become more and more rational, and the imitative effect will gradually decrease and eventually disappear after reaching a certain peak value, furthermore, the lenders’ investment decision imitation effect of loan orders with poor information disclosure is more prominent than that of orders with perfect information disclosure. The research shows that the imitation effect of lenders’ investment decisions is mainly related to incomplete information disclosure in the internet loan market, and the paper’s outcome is important for us to exhaustively understand the risk accumulation caused by lenders’ investment decisions imitation effect and how to solve the information disclosure mechanism problem effectively.
Keywords
Internet Lending, Investment Decisions, Imitation Effect, Loan Order
To cite this article
Bo Yao, Analysis on the Imitation Effect of Investment Decisions in Internet Lending Market, Journal of Business and Economic Development. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2018, pp. 97-105. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20180303.15
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Lin, M., Prabhala, N. R., Viswanathan, S. Judging Borrowers by the Company they Keep: Social Networks and Adverse Selection in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending [R]. Working Paper, 2009.
[2]
Pi Tianlei, Zhao Tie. Internet Finance: Logic, Comparison and Mechanism [J]. China Economic Studies, 2014, (7):98-108.
[3]
Kumar, A., Lee, C. Retail Investor Sentiment and Return Comovements [J]. The Journal of Finance, 2006, 61 (5): 2451-2486.
[4]
Herzenstein, M., Dholakia, U. M., Andrews, R. L. Strategic Herding Behavior in Peer-to-Peer Loan Auctions [J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2011, 25 (1): 27-36.
[5]
Shen, D., Krumme, C., Lippman, A. Fellow the Profit or the Herd? Exploring Social Effects in Peer-to-Peer Lending [C]. Social Computing, 2010 IEEE 2nd International Conference on ISBN, Houston: ISBN, 2010. 137-144.
[6]
Lee, E., Lee, B. Herding Behavior in Online P2P Lending: an Empirical Investigation [J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2012, 11 (5): 495-503.
[7]
Zhang, J., Liu, P. Rational Herding in Microloan Markets [J]. Management Science, 2012, 58 (5): 892-912.
[8]
Chen, N., Han, C. A Comparative Study of Online P2P Lending in the USA and China [J]. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 2012, 16 (2): 2-15.
[9]
Puro, L., Teich, J. E., Wallenius, H., et al. Bidding Strategies for Real-life Small Loan Auctions [J]. Decision Support Systems, 2011, 51 (1):31-41.
[10]
Chen Xiao. Research on the Cost of Private Lending——Empirical Analysis of Internet Lending based on P2P [J]. Journal of Finance Economics Research, 2014, (1):37-48.
[11]
Akerlof, G. A. The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970, 84 (3):488-500.
[12]
Stiglitz, J. E., Weiss, A. Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information [J]. American Economic Review, 1981, 71 (3):393-410.
[13]
Bester, H. Screening vs. Rationing in Credit Markets with Imperfect Information [J]. American Economic Review, 1985, 75 (4):850-855.
[14]
Barasinska, N., Schafer, D. Is Crowd-funding Different? Evidence on the Relation between Gender and Funding Success from a German Peer-to-Peer Lending Platform [J]. German Economic Review, 2014, 15 (4):436-452.
[15]
Li Yan, Gaoyijun, Li Zhenni, Cai Zihao, Wang Bingting, Yang Yuxuan. The Impact of Borrowers' Descriptive Information on Investors' Decision Making——Analysis of Internet Lending Platform based on P2P [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2014, (1):143-155.
[16]
Zhuang Lei, Zhou Qin. Identity Discrimination: Research on Internet Finance Innovation Efficiency [J]. Economic Management, 2015, (4):136-147.
[17]
Wu Zhiwei, Chen Ying. An Empirical Study on Factors Influencing Lenders' Loyalty in China's Securities Market [J]. Soft Science, 2010, (1):114-120.
Browse journals by subject