Volume 5, Issue 2, June 2020, Page: 108-112
Research on Connotation, Mechanism and Realization Way of “Going-global” Inland Open Economy and the “Bringing in” Inland Resource Economy in Sichuan Province
Zeng Liyun, Rattanakosin International College of Creative Entrepreneurship, Rajamangala University of Technology, Rattanakosin – RICE, Bangkok, Thailand; Civil and Architecture Engineering School, Panzhihua University, Panzhihua, China
Mao Yunyi, Economics and Management School, Panzhihua University, Panzhihua, China
Received: Apr. 24, 2020;       Accepted: Jun. 4, 2020;       Published: Jun. 15, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17      View  46      Downloads  14
Abstract
Under the macro background of the continuous deterioration of the international trade environment, the policy of “One Belt and One Road” is deeply constructed, and new industrialization and urbanization are highly integrated [1]. According to the single model of eastward opening-up, the purpose is to eliminate some unfavorable effects, including the aggravated trade frictions, the recessional resource-based industries, the extensive promotion between informatization and industrialization and the uneven regional economic development [2]. Under this circumstance, Sichuan has successively launched a series of major countermeasures for the implementation of regional openness, undertaking of industry transition, and the international cooperation on production capacity. In light of the internal relationship between “going global” and “bringing in” strategy, the research analyzes the necessity, feasibility and regularity of the transition from the Inland Resource Economy (IRE) to the Inland Open Economy (IOE). It reveals that the basic connotation and formative mechanism of the "going global" IOE. The research method is comparative analysis of two regional development models, including the basic conditions, main objectives, core contents, industrial patterns and realizable way. This article demonstrates that rationality of the stages and applicability of regions, how the output of production capacity replaces output of factors, and how a resource-driven mode changes to an openness-driven mode.
Keywords
Regional Openness, Industrial Undertaking, Capacity Cooperation, Realization Way
To cite this article
Zeng Liyun, Mao Yunyi, Research on Connotation, Mechanism and Realization Way of “Going-global” Inland Open Economy and the “Bringing in” Inland Resource Economy in Sichuan Province, Journal of Business and Economic Development. Vol. 5, No. 2, 2020, pp. 108-112. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20200502.17
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Liu Zhibiao, Wu Fuxiang. Double embedding of global value chain under the “Belt and Road Initiative“. Chinese Social Sciences, 2018 (08): 17-32.
[2]
Hu Ying. Research on China's regional economic development model. Commercial Economic Research, 2019 (15): 160-163.
[3]
Wu Qi. A review of the research on the open economy of inland China. New West, 2019 (15): 73-74.
[4]
Li Hongbing, Wen Lei, Lin Xuedong. The strategy of "excellent entry and superior exit" of China's foreign trade: a study based on the perspective of product quality and value added rate.
[5]
Chen Anna. Research on the development model of the Chinese railway “going global” in the new era. Business Economics Research, 2019 (14): 176-178.
[6]
Feng Xiaoyang. Research on the Necessity of Building an Inland Open Economic Highland in Chengdu. Cooperative Economy and Science and Technology, 2019 (15): 4-7.
[7]
Shen Jiayan, Wang Fang, Liu Zhenze. Global Opening, Industrial Undertaking and Policy Coordination—Taking the Construction of Open Inland Highlands in Sichuan as an Example. Agricultural Economics and Science and Technology, 2016 (17): 266-267.
[8]
Huang Zhuoli. The main path of China ’s foreign trade opening and its current characteristics [J]. Modern Marketing (Management Edition), 2020 (01): 70. X.
[9]
Fu Xiaodong, Wang Jingtian, Cui Xiaoyu. Regional economic policy practice and theoretical research since the founding of New China [J]. Regional Economic Review, 2019 (04): 8-24. X.
[10]
Wang Wenyu. Globalization and the transformation of China ’s regional industrial structure [C]. Economic Geography Committee of the Chinese Geographical Society. Summary of the 2019 Annual Meeting of the Economic Geography Committee of the Chinese Geographical Society. Professional Committee of Economic Geography of the Chinese Geographical Society: China Geography Learn, 2019: 13. X.
[11]
Li Haiyue. International Economic and Trade Development and my country's Foreign Trade Strategic Choice [J]. China Business Review, 2019 (10): 92-93. X.
[12]
Liu Huajun, Jia Wenxing, Peng Ying, Pei Yanfeng. Has the spatial spillover of regional economy narrowed the regional gap? —— Empirical evidence from the paradigm of relational data analysis [J]. Economic and Management Review, 2019, 35 (01): 122-133. X.
[13]
Si Zengchuo, Zhou Kun, Shao Jun. China's foreign trade upgrade: efficiency improvement and potential realization [J]. Shanghai Economic Research, 2019 (01): 113-128.
[14]
Kuang Cuifen. Analysis of my country's foreign trade strategy formulation from the perspective of international economic and trade [J]. Modern Economic Information, 2019 (01): 146.
[15]
Li Yinghui, Li Jing. The practice of inland opening in China: mechanism analysis and economic growth effect [J / OL]. Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University (Social Science Edition): 1-13 [2020-06-01]. http: //kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/50.1154.C.20191227.0922.002.html.
Browse journals by subject